Intel also offers the ability to construct your very own NUC using their DIY kit.Windows PC or a Mac when it comes to recording & producing music. It competes with the 2020 Mac Mini and it’s much more affordable. The Intel NUC NUC8i5BEK is the best Mini PC for music production I’ve ever seen. The older 2018 mini supported up to three.Today, we’ll be looking at the best Mini PC for music production and also one of the most affordable computers. The other is forced to use HDMI. Apple The Complete Desktop Recording Studio with Mac Mini Features: Apple Mac Mini 2.3GHz dual-core Intel Core i5, 2GB Memory, 500GB HDD Avid MobilePre 2x2 audio interface and Pro Tools MP recording software ASUS 20-inch LCD computer monitor KORG nanoKONTROL2 slim-line USB control surface, in white Tascam TM78 vocal/instrument condenser microphone A pair of Tascam HPVT1 headphonesGarageBand is a fully equipped music creation studio right inside your Mac with a complete sound library that includes instruments, presets for guitar and voice, and an incredible selection of session drummers and percussionists.A related limitation – which may be attributed to the reduced number of ports, the limitations of Apple Silicon, or perhaps both – the M1 Mac mini only supports two displays, and only one of those over Thunderbolt.USB 4 uses a USB type-C connector, offers 40 gigabits per second of speed and supports power delivery up to 100 watts, all specs that sound extremely familiar if you've read up on the details of Thunderbolt 3. While that may leave some users scratching their heads – Thunderbolt and USB were initially competing formats – the recently released USB 4 standard conforms to most of the Thunderbolt 3 specs. FOR SALE BRAND NEW FACTORY SEALED.Everything you need to start.It's also worth noting that the Thunderbolt 3 ports found on the Mac mini are also USB 4 ports. I'd personally get a new iMac, rather than a 2nd hand Mac mini - newer machines will last longer, and be compatible with OS X updates further into the future.APPLE COMPLETE RECORDING Studio with Mac mini V7 (MGEM2LL/A) Retail 999.99 - 829.00. It's an inconvenience for a specific niche of users, but it's a niche Apple has catered to in the past.In terms of power, both are sufficient for audio recording, and GarageBand is included on any new Mac, which is a great start for getting into DAWs. While the average user may not have any need for a 10 gigabit connection, that capability was especially welcome for meeting the demands of video professionals that need those speeds for pulling uncompressed video files from network attached storage, as well as other professional users that may have 10 gigabit available in the office.It combines processing and graphics onto the same system on a chip (SoC) and also packs in other features, like a secure enclave for security, unified memory for utilizing RAM more efficiently, and an integrated storage controller with accelerated cryptography for faster, more secure storage. We'll get into that more later.The chip itself is a 3.2 GHz processor with 16 billion transistors squeezed onto its silicon. It's the same processor found in the new MacBook Air and MacBook Pro, and by offering that identical hardware the Mac mini promises more or less identical performance. Mac mini with M1 review: Hardware changesThe Mac mini M1 is outfitted with the Apple M1 processor, the first CPU in the Apple Silicon family to come to Macs. But we can't discount the possibility that Apple opted for the now universal standard instead of Thunderbolt 4 because it's a proprietary Intel connection, and the Apple/Intel relationship is profoundly different now that Apple is migrating away from Intel-based Macs. It's also backwards compatible with USB 3.2 and USB 2.0, but that's less of a concern thanks to the two USB 3.0 connections already offered by the Mac mini.This is also notable in part because Apple – an early adopter of Thunderbolt technology – has not switched to Thunderbolt 4, likely because the development of the M1 processor focused on the well-established Thunderbolt 3 standard instead of the new Thunderbolt 4.
Mini For Recording Studio Mac When ItBut as the first desktop running on Mac processing hardware, it's a taste of things to come soon for other desktop systems, from the iMac to the Mac Pro workstation. It is the typical mini PC in that sense, and in this case the prototypical Mac desktop. But it's not 100% compatible with everything, so hiccups may arise as you get your own selection of preferred programs loaded up on your new Mac mini.But in the big shift from Intel to Apple Silicon, Mac mini is the reasonable place to start with this transition, given that the tiny PC is built to leverage laptop grade processing hardware in a compact desktop form factor. It's a technical tool to make everything play nicely while Apple balances two very different systems, providing equal capability to both until Apple is able to fully transition to Apple Silicon for all Macs sometime in the next couple of years.It works well enough that you'll (almost) never notice the difference, unless you use one of a handful of apps that flat out aren't supported, like x86 virtualization software (like Parallels or VMWare Fusion). The Mac mini falls somewhere between the two, but easily ranks on the high-end for mini PCs.Getting into a more real-world comparison of processing muscle, we turn to Handbrake, testing how quickly a system can transcode a 4K video clip to 1080p. On the other end of the spectrum is the Intel NUC 9 Pro, outfitted with an Xeon E-2286M processor, which had a category-leading score of 7,985. The Lenovo ThinkCentre M90N Nano scored a much more modest 3,265 with an Intel Core i5-8365U processor. Word for mac 1610 find colorsThe Intel NUC 9 Pro did better (849.7), but the Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n only managed 390.Initally, we looked at how well the Mac mini did with gaming. Here, the Mac mini scored 566 points. But it again falls in between the slower Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n (20:23) and the faster Nvidia Quadro-equipped Intel NUC 9 Pro (8:23) The Mac mini was faster with the native app.Looking at a different real-world application, we use the PugetBench 30-minute Photoshop challenge, which simulates using the system for graphics work. The MacBook Pro was slightly faster (7:46) and the MacBook Air a bit behind at 9:08.Rerunning the Handbrake test with the Intel-friendly version using Rosetta 2, the Mac mini did the same task in 12:38, significantly slower than when using the Apple-optimized version. Gaming is limited on the little Mac, and there's no clear benefit to getting the Mac mini if you can afford to buy one of Apple's M1 MacBooks. There are always more powerful systems out there, like the Intel NUC 9 Pro, but for a budget desktop, Mac mini marries great value with surprisingly potent performance.But it's not all sunshine and roses. That's in line with both the M1 MacBook Air and MacBook Pro, which managed 37 and 38 fps at the in-between resolution of 1440 x 900 that was usable on the MacBook display.But while the Mac mini offered a playable 31.5 fps with its integrated graphics capability, it was outpaced by both the Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n (73.6) and the Intel NUC 9 Pro (100.1 fps) despite the fact that only the NUC had a dedicated graphics card.The overall conclusion seems clear: For most uses the Apple M1 chip can take on Core i3 and Core i5 processors and win.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorMichelle ArchivesCategories |